How should interpreters provide feedback to peers, according to the CPC?

Providing feedback that is constructive and respectful is essential for fostering a professional environment among interpreters. The purpose of feedback is not only to commend but also to identify areas for improvement, which is crucial for professional development. Constructive feedback involves offering specific insights on performance rather than vague critiques, allowing peers to understand what they did well and what aspects require enhancement.

Respectfulness ensures that the feedback is received positively, encouraging an open dialogue rather than making the recipient feel defensive or disheartened. A respectful approach helps build trust and promotes a collaborative atmosphere where interpreters feel comfortable seeking and giving feedback. This practice aligns closely with the ethical standards set forth in the CPC, which prioritize professionalism and mutual support among colleagues in the interpreting field.

The other options do not align with the principles of effective feedback. Focusing on personal opinions can lead to subjective evaluations that lack constructive value. Providing feedback privately is important, but it should not discourage sharing valuable insights that can aid collective learning. Minimizing feedback to avoid discomfort undermines the growth opportunities that arise from receiving honest evaluations.