What should interpreters do if they encounter a situation where their impartiality is compromised?

When interpreters find themselves in a situation where their impartiality is compromised, stepping back from the assignment is the most appropriate course of action. This is grounded in the principles of ethical practice within the interpreting profession, as outlined in the RID Code of Professional Conduct (CPC).

Impartiality is crucial to maintaining trust and integrity between all parties involved in the interpreting process. If an interpreter feels that personal biases, conflicts of interest, or any factors influence their ability to remain neutral, withdrawing from the assignment helps ensure that clear and unbiased communication can occur. This action protects the interests of the clients and upholds the ethical standards that guide professional interpreters.

The other options do not adequately address the need to maintain impartiality. Proceeding with the assignment, even with documentation, could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations that affect the quality of interpretation and trustworthiness of the interpreter. Informing an employer might be useful, but it does not directly resolve the conflict of interest at the moment. Engaging with the client about how to proceed may inadvertently lead to further complications rather than ensuring an ethical separation from the assignment.